The BANNED Professor’s BRUTALLY Honest Opinion On COVID-19 & Dr Fauci… | Dr Bret Weinstein – YouTube

Transcript>

pt

0:00
the
0:01
covid crisis and mind you all of the
0:04
words here need caveats I do believe
0:08
that there was a pathogen SARS K2 I do
0:13
not believe that we had anything that
0:15
would by the prior definition be called
0:18
a pandemic I do not believe it was
0:21
inherently an
0:23
emergency but nonetheless these are the
0:26
terms we use the covid
0:28
pandemic was something kind of emergency
0:31
we were delivered something wrongly
0:33
called
0:35
vaccines we
0:37
were propagandized into avoiding
0:40
off-patent drugs that really did work
0:44
and
0:45
so uh and you know we made our situation
0:48
vastly worse we locked down which
0:51
injured people we put masks on children
0:56
which literally disrupted their Norm
0:59
noral developmental
1:02
processes we kept vaccinating and
1:05
revaccinated which has created an entire
1:08
landscape of Adverse Events and early
1:12
deaths which we are still not being
1:14
honest
1:16
about so the three and a half Realms are
1:20
the
1:21
origin of the virus which is all but
1:25
certain to have been laboratory and very
1:27
probably the Wuhan Institute but the
1:29
Wuhan Wuhan Institute isn’t the Wuhan
1:31
Institute of virology it’s also
1:33
connected to uh the NIH Anthony
1:38
fouchy
1:40
this enhancement this gain of function
1:42
research that was embarked upon was
1:46
Downstream of a weapons
1:49
program and what’s gain of function
1:52
research gain of function research is
1:55
where various techniques are employed to
1:58
give a path
2:00
in this case a virus capabilities that
2:03
it didn’t otherwise have okay so what I
2:06
I think happened in the origin of Co we
2:08
can now tell a pretty good story you
2:11
have a
2:13
vast um network of
2:17
Laboratories working to find new
2:21
pathogens that can be turned into
2:23
weapons what story they tell themselves
2:25
about why we need these weapons I don’t
2:27
know but it is clear that if you are
2:32
working to enhance human health or you
2:36
say you are that you are allowed to
2:38
enhance The lethality of germs as part
2:41
of a dual use
2:43
program so the excuse is oh we’re
2:46
working to prepare the world from a
2:48
pandemic it’s not a matter of if it’s a
2:50
matter of when right that’s what they
2:53
tell us it’s not true the likelihood of
2:56
a pathogen leaping from nature to humans
2:59
is actually quite remote for reasons
3:02
that it took me a long time to realize
3:03
but I now get it loud and clear
3:06
pathogens don’t jump from animals to
3:09
humans very easily because it’s not an
3:11
easy jump right they have to do two
3:14
tricks and they have to do it in Rapid
3:16
succession in order for it to work the
3:17
first trick is they have to actually
3:20
infect a human
3:21
being the second trick is before that
3:24
human being dies or gets better they
3:26
have to learn to jump to a second human
3:28
being that is not not an easy trick so
3:32
what human beings have done is they have
3:34
started accelerating that process in
3:36
Laboratories that are specifically
3:39
attempting to
3:40
create these highly path pathogenic um
3:46
creatures that infect people for the
3:49
purpose of creating weapons
3:52
so what happened in Wuhan I believe is
3:58
there was a case where some Chinese
4:02
miners who were working in a mine that
4:05
was full of bats they were actually
4:07
literally shoveling bat guano out of
4:09
this
4:11
mine six of them became sick and three
4:15
of them
4:16
died none of them made anybody else sick
4:19
and they were all compromised because
4:21
they were breathing this dust in in the
4:23
mine which made them vulnerable but the
4:26
fact that six miners got sick from a
4:29
virus in this mine told the folks at the
4:32
Wuhan Institute of virology who were
4:35
connected directly to some American
4:39
researchers told them aha there is a
4:43
virus in a cave in Yan Province and the
4:48
virus already knows one of the two
4:49
tricks it can infect a human what we
4:53
need to do is find that virus and
4:55
enhance it so that we have a virus that
4:57
can spread between people why would they
5:00
want a virus that can spread between
5:01
people because they’re part of a cryptic
5:03
weapons program ah okay now if that
5:06
sounds Preposterous to you and I can
5:08
imagine that it would I can imagine
5:10
myself 5 years ago thinking that sounds
5:13
absolutely ridiculous and uh paranoid
5:17
frankly I would I would suggest that
5:20
people read Robert Robert F Kennedy
5:23
Jr’s uh most recent book it’s called the
5:27
Wuhan coverup in which he explor
5:29
explores at Great length this weapons
5:32
program and its probable link to SARS
5:36
K2 it is also worth reading the book he
5:40
wrote before that the real Anthony
5:42
fouchy when one comes to understand that
5:44
the reason that Anthony fouchy was the
5:46
highest paid federal worker in the US
5:48
bar
5:49
nun that’s because he was the head of a
5:52
weapons program desguised as a public
5:54
health program okay so Anthony fouchy is
5:57
the guy that I saw on TV telling giving
5:59
us ad advice I want to do about this
6:01
pandemic he was he was the guy and he
6:03
was like the medical adviser guy the
6:05
medical advisor guy but the funny thing
6:07
is Anthony fouchy is largely responsible
6:11
for the gain of function research that
6:14
created the virus in the first place
6:16
that made it a human pathogen how do we
6:18
know that um because we now know that
6:22
there was a ban on gain of function
6:26
research in the US and that Anthony
6:28
fouchy was was part of the effort to
6:31
Offshore the work to Ralph barck who is
6:35
an American researcher still is an
6:36
American researcher his Partners in the
6:38
Wuhan Institute of virology XI Jen Lee
6:42
being the primary so what they did was
6:45
they evaded a ban that arose in the US I
6:48
believe in 2015 as a result of very
6:51
realistic fears that a virus would
6:53
escape from gain of function research
6:55
they offshored it to the Wuhan Institute
6:57
of virology so the work could continue
6:59
that was Anthony fouche’s work so
7:01
somehow he ends up both in a position to
7:05
fund and fuel the research that creates
7:09
the virus and then he’s the go-to guy
7:11
for advice about what we should do about
7:13
it that’s a very odd coincidence and it
7:16
worked out very badly for planet Earth
7:18
why would Anthony
7:20
fouchy send offshore it to China who are
7:24
I would consider to be one of the US’s
7:26
arch nemesis yeah that is a great
7:29
question I don’t know the answer to it
7:31
you wouldn’t want China to have that
7:32
information it’s like developing the
7:33
nuclear bomb in Russia or something well
7:35
I actually think that uh folks like you
7:38
and me
7:40
are we don’t get
7:42
it we think that China is a nation and
7:47
America is a nation and that these
7:49
nations are
7:52
antagonists we don’t understand that
7:54
actually the United States while it is a
7:57
nation is also a set of factions and
8:01
those factions don’t agree one faction
8:03
decided to forbid gain of function
8:06
research another faction decided oh no
8:08
you don’t and we know how to get it done
8:10
and it was partnered with some faction
8:12
of that Chinese entity you know uh
8:16
across the water
8:18
and if I if I think about how America
8:21
looks to Outsiders right I can imagine
8:24
people talking about oh the Americans
8:26
are doing this right but if you’re
8:28
talking about what the B Administration
8:30
is doing you’re not talking about me the
8:33
Biden Administration isn’t on my team
8:34
I’ll guarantee that right so the point
8:36
is the Biden Administration is my
8:39
antagonist the Americans are a composite
8:43
of antagonists I mean I guess in one
8:45
sense but I don’t know why we offshored
8:48
weapons research to China I don’t know
8:52
that there isn’t a partnership between
8:56
entities that is much more relevant to
9:00
the unfolding of events that simply
9:03
doesn’t have a name I would recognize
9:05
but somehow we know that we did it we
9:07
know that the research was forbidden
9:09
here and we know you know Ralph baric
9:11
trained XI Jang Lee in how to do
9:14
techniques including what he calls no
9:16
seeum
9:17
edits those are edits you can’t
9:20
see why would a biologist interested in
9:23
studying pathogens in order to make
9:25
people healthier care whether you could
9:26
see their edits could could it not be
9:28
the case that fouchy moved the project
9:31
to China the gain of function research
9:33
to China where was involved in that
9:35
because he wanted to come up he wanted
9:37
to understand these pathogens these
9:38
viruses better so that we could do
9:41
experiments on them to better understand
9:43
them to figure out how to defend against
9:44
them this is exactly what they tell you
9:48
I’m a
9:49
biologist maybe I’m dumb but that story
9:53
doesn’t make any sense to me you’re
9:54
going to create a new
9:57
virus from a ancestor you’ve pulled out
10:02
of a cave in yunan province that you’ve
10:04
enhanced in some way that you decided to
10:06
enhance it it doesn’t tell you about
10:09
some virus that’s going to LEAP out of
10:11
nature of its own accord it tells you
10:13
about the virus you just created it
10:15
doesn’t make sense from the point of
10:17
view of enhancing human health for two
10:19
reasons one there’s no demonstrated
10:22
evidence that such research has given us
10:25
any benefit whatsoever in fighting off
10:27
pathogens there’s no case in which we’ve
10:29
seen that what we do have are multiple
10:32
cases of leaks of pathogens from Labs
10:35
studying them
10:37
so we’ve just got a simple comparison
10:40
what are the chances if you study some
10:42
virus you plucked out of some cave that
10:44
you’re going to come up with something
10:45
useful that’s actually going to help us
10:47
certainly didn’t happen with covid
10:49
chances are very low what are the
10:51
chances that things going to leak from
10:52
your lab and cause a global pandemic um
10:56
pretty high actually mhm I just I just
11:00
imagine scientists in the lab would take
11:01
a sample of it they’d put it in the lab
11:03
they’d start analyzing it they might
11:04
start doing tests on it to see how it
11:06
responds to certain things and then you
11:09
know through no fault of their own maybe
11:10
it
11:11
leaked okay but let’s let’s see how that
11:15
played
11:16
out we’ve got some genan jocks pulling a
11:21
virus out of a unon cave and enhancing
11:25
it so that it becomes
11:27
a communicable human power
11:32
pathogen they should in theory in
11:35
studying it have come up with
11:36
information that would tell us what to
11:39
do if such a pathogen ever got out which
11:41
it did because they lost control of it
11:44
well what did they tell us they told
11:47
us don’t use Ivermectin don’t use
11:50
hydroxy chloroquin that what you should
11:53
do is you should wait at
11:56
home until you’re actually you’re lips
11:59
are turning blue then you should come
12:01
get medical
12:03
help
12:05
now that’s wrong in every way the right
12:10
thing to do was to allow doctors to look
12:13
at the patients who were coming into
12:14
their office and to figure out how to
12:16
treat them those doctors should have
12:18
said you well this person uh they appear
12:20
to be sick with a uh a respiratory
12:24
pathogen there’s a good chance that it’s
12:26
an RNA virus they could have quickly
12:28
actually asked attained that it was an
12:30
RNA virus you know what works on all RNA
12:33
viruses
12:34
icton then they could have treated it
12:36
and they would have seen oh icon works
12:39
for covid if you give it very early if
12:43
you give it in sufficient Doses and if
12:46
you give it with
12:48
fat okay doctors would have figured that
12:50
out on their own instead what we got was
12:52
a message from the very people who had
12:54
engaged in offshoring this research
12:57
ostensibly to figure out how to deal
12:59
with Co who then gave us exactly the
13:01
inverse of the right advice right and
13:03
then what did they do well then they
13:06
told us the route out of this is a
13:10
vaccine what they delivered was not a
13:12
vaccine it was a gene therapy that gene
13:16
therapy we were told blocks the
13:19
contraction and the transmission of
13:23
covid and what happened was they
13:26
demonized everybody who questioned
13:28
either the safe or the efficacy or both
13:31
of these
13:33
treatments turned out that didn’t work
13:36
so what we have this is why I say that
13:39
the covid
13:40
story uh diagnoses the
13:43
system if you think and a person could
13:47
be well within their rights to think
13:50
well I’m sure we were studying the virus
13:53
to protect people and that it would tell
13:54
us something about what should be done
13:56
if it ever were to LEAP into human
14:00
well we got a perfect test of how well
14:01
that worked every single thing they told
14:03
us to do was wrong and upside down if
14:06
you took what they call the vaccine you
14:08
put yourself in Jeopardy if you ignored
14:11
their advice and you used icton and
14:14
hydroxychloroquine and you used it early
14:17
and you used it in sufficient quantities
14:19
it actually was highly effective and
14:21
actually rendered this uh illness
14:24
perfectly manageable for almost every
14:26
single
14:27
person so
14:29
we’ve seen how well they did they failed
14:31
across the boorder do you think there’s
14:33
malicious intent somewhere because when
14:35
people hear these stories they and
14:37
because the average Joe doesn’t know how
14:38
systems above them work they tend to
14:40
think of this like Illuminati group of
14:42
people coming together deciding this was
14:44
going to happen then executing this plan
14:45
for some because these you know this
14:47
this room of people who are evil who
14:49
people refer to as like they um wanted
14:52
to do harm and they want to control us
14:55
that’s the kind kind of conspiracy
14:57
narrative um I have no idea what
15:01
motivates such people my guess is most
15:06
of the people who
15:08
participated in the programs that did so
15:11
much harm thought they were doing the
15:13
right thing I don’t think that’s true
15:15
for all of them though I don’t think
15:16
that’s true for Anthony fouchy you you
15:18
don’t think he thinks he was doing the
15:20
right thing I think he knows he’s a
15:21
weapons guy and that when you’re a
15:26
weapons guy you are inherently
15:28
comfortable
15:29
with the destruction of human beings
15:31
that’s what you do for a living you’re
15:33
trying to create things that destroy
15:34
human beings and I don’t know what it
15:36
would be like to have such a job I’ve
15:39
never had one but my guess is there is a
15:43
mechanism for rationalizing absolutely
15:46
ghastly things if what you do for a
15:50
living is plot the destruction of
15:55
others now you rais this as a concern as
15:58
one of your key concerns because I guess
16:00
you think we haven’t learned our lessons
16:01
from this no we haven’t um we and I
16:04
think things are a little bit inverted
16:07
in uh in Britain in the
16:12
US there is widespread discussion of the
16:15
harms that came from the so-called
16:18
vaccines but the question of the
16:21
repurposed
16:23
drugs uh has still that story has not
16:25
broken people still think that iacon on
16:28
Hydrox oxy chloroquin don’t work and
16:30
never worked for Co um I think this
16:34
story is in general the
16:36
inverse that um the vaccine harms are
16:41
still Taboo in Britain and there’s more
16:44
acceptance of of repurposed drugs but
16:47
really what we need is a No Holds Barred
16:52
exploration of what happened
16:54
irrespective of what it was maybe I’ve
16:56
got it all wrong and maybe that would
16:58
emerge in
16:59
an investigation but we need to look at
17:03
the viral Origins how exactly that
17:07
happen we need to look at what was done
17:12
the coup that public health staged
17:14
against medicine in which directives
17:17
about how to treat patients came down
17:19
from on high rather than the normal
17:21
medical process of doctors figuring out
17:23
how how to treat their patients
17:25
empirically and pooling their
17:27
insights and we need to talk about what
17:30
happened where these Gene therapies came
17:33
from what was understood about the
17:37
danger and uh how it is that we treat
17:41
all of the people who frankly did
17:43
exactly what they were asked to do and
17:46
have had their lives compromised or lost
17:50
because of injuries that they were not
17:51
told were possible if you love the
17:54
driver CEO brand and you watch this
17:56
Channel please do me a huge favor become
17:58
part of of the 15% of the viewers on
18:01
this channel that have hit the Subscribe
18:02
button it helps us tremendously and the
18:04
bigger the channel gets the bigger the
18:06
guests

Luka’ says 120,000…that’s a lotta fellas to support in the field. Recalling Napoleon: “You can do a lot with bayonets except sit on them.”

“Ukraine may be trying to provoke Moscow into using nuclear weapons, Lukashenko said while commenting on the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ offensive in the Kursk region.

Other statements from his interview with “Russia-1″:

➡️”Ukraine is raising the stakes with the Kursk region, and this is wrong,”

➡️”Putin and Russian forces will wipe out the Ukrainian military in the Kursk region,”

➡️”Putin and I see that the West may directly deploy its military units into Ukraine,”

➡️”Ukraine has over 120,000 troops stationed on the border with Belarus,”

➡️”If we don’t sit down at the negotiating table, there will be an escalation that will end with the destruction of Ukraine.”

🔴 @DDGeopolitics
6.8Kviews02:17 ”

……………

Frank Zappa said:

“Reality is invented for you by people who design it like a choreography; there’s definitely an office somewhere in Washington, with people you’ve never heard of, that designs reality. It’s not just about what will be the next event to come up but rather what will be the interpretation of a given international event And this must be distributed everywhere through the media, without anyone asking questions about it.”

https://x.com/AmericanFWoman/status/1806092275379851726?t=3GsWePGZxK6pOxmLtDZeOA&s=19

https://x.com/YvesUitGent/status/1823292278477144563?t=TzMx5jG8lnmIafz4975OBg&s=19

Ukraine may be trying to provoke Moscow into using nuclear weapons, Lukashenko said while commenting on the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ offensive in the Kursk region.

Other statements from his interview with “Russia-1″:

➡️”Ukraine is raising the stakes with the Kursk region, and this is wrong,”

➡️”Putin and Russian forces will wipe out the Ukrainian military in the Kursk region,”

➡️”Putin and I see that the West may directly deploy its military units into Ukraine,”

➡️”Ukraine has over 120,000 troops stationed on the border with Belarus,”

➡️”If we don’t sit down at the negotiating table, there will be an escalation that will end with the destruction of Ukraine.”

🔴 @DDGeopolitics
2.6Kviews02:17

……………….

[Times of London]

The newspaper also reports that the appearance of Challenger tanks in the Kursk region was a deliberate decision by the new British cabinet, implying that Britain was aware of the operation in advance and helped prepare for it.

“The decision by Starmer and Healy made last week was not a change in policy but a shift in tone to be more open about Britain’s role in trying to convince key allies to do more to assist,” the article states.

As for the long-range weapons that Ukraine seeks permission to use against Russia, the publication reports that consultations with allies are ongoing.

In particular, London insists that such permission should be granted simultaneously by the United States and Germany.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics  (my bold, geewhiz Churchill’s antipathy and lust abides, Operation Unthinkable etc unfolds, with the FDR nuance…nuance? Yeah, “It’s desired that the enemy be seen to have struck the first blow”)

Anschlag Ost Barbarossa 
1.6Kviews02:2

Recall I agree with Gilbert Doctorow as to proper (real-politik) comportment with respect to putative “Enemy States”, ie Scott made several material transgressions, imho.  FWIW I don’t think Scott broke the FARA statute, but I also don’t think that matters. Anybody that doesn’t think that Courts are political is simply a fool, or a naif. Momma dun tol’ me longtimeago!

https://www.leefang.com/p/leaked-israeli-docs-reveal-effort

FARA maybe fubar zionist lobby

Leaked Israeli Docs Reveal Effort to Evade Foreign Agent Lobbying Law
Former general counsel of Democratic National Committee secretly advised the Israeli government on how to avoid FARA registration of its U.S. propaganda program.

https://www.leefang.com/p/leaked-israeli-docs-reveal-effort

Antimony, the big use is in the cheapest energy storage device, the lead-acid battery. Car batteries.

https://www.antimony.com/antimony-2/ (see there uses)

Indeed, this is going to make things dicey for the nazis

When Presidents Kill

Napolitano wrote a fine essay. Murder, it’s illegal. A crime. It violates the most fundamental right, the right to life.

Not Answerable to Law & Constitution

If the presidents are right, and the AUMFs authorize them to kill whomever they wish — including Americans — then they are not presidents answerable to the law and the Constitution, but kings who can kill on a whim without transparency or legal consequence.

The whole purpose of confining the war-making power to Congress and the war-waging power to the president was to keep those powers separate. History is littered with examples of tyrants using the powers of the state to kill for no moral purpose.

American presidents have given themselves the power to kill. It is the functional equivalent to a loaded gun in a drawer of the president’s desk.