Forum Replies Created
-
fella at locals posted this…fwiw I agree, losers always double, these creeps actually imagine the bombs and the yanky won the war…they are almost entirely delusional, and they’re losers.
BLOCKBUSTER ANALYSIS – DANIEL DAVIS
Boots on the ground?
Nahh! Nukes on the ground.I like it!
There is a high chance the US will use tactical nukes when it starts to lose against Iran. These are a force multiplier of three orders of magnitude greater than conventionals and which thus provide virtually unlimited force compared to its carrier and ship based conventional weapons. If Iran trashes Israel, which it will with a high probability, Israel will threaten to use ballistic nuclear weapons. The US would then decide to use smaller tactical nukes to crush Iran to dissuade Israel from using its larger nuclear weapons. To those who say the US won’t do this, I ask, who will stop them? Remember that the US is the only country to have used nuclear weapons in war, and then it wasn’t on the grounds of an existential threat to the US. The nuclear bombs were used to end the Pacific war to limit further US expense and casualties from a land invasion of Japan and to send a message to the USSR. The US doesn’t want to invade Iran so tactical nukes? What’s not to like?
The US could use a similar expedient rationale to avoid a long, costly war against Iran, especially if Israel is losing badly and will weigh in with their nukes anyway.
I don’t know where Trump stands on the issue of tactical nukes, but we know he has a strong aversion to land invasions. His judgement hasn’t been shown to be particularly sharp and there are plenty in the Pentagon, the CIA, and congress who will cheer him on. Lindsey Grahame et al. will all foam at the mouth at such an event; a horrible sight.
Will Russia, China, North Korea or India attack the US and start WWIII? Pakistan might, but I doubt it, as they would be toast about an hour after. ENDE
movie to weekend popcorn hours…Five | Full Movie | Starring William Phipps, Susan Douglas Rubes, James Anderson & Charles Lampkin – смотреть онлайн в поиске Яндекса по Видео
Comrade Pepe…
I’ve extensively written about that on Asia Times during the past decade. At the time, Goldman Sachs derivative experts were adamant: if Hormuz is blocked, before or during a full-scale naval war in the Gulf, oil may reach $700.00 a barrel.
And this will only be temporary – because the entire global economy will collapse.
Most of all, the blocking of Hormuz would trigger the detonation of the TWO QUADRILLION (caps mine) dollars derivative market – updating the initial, misleading calculation by the BIS (Bank for International Settlements), placed at $700 trillion. Over the years, several Gulf traders, off the record, have agreed with the “quadrillion” numbers.
Also during the past decade, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff admitted that they do not have the military ability to keep Hormuz open. That remains the case.
Now cut to clueless little gusano Marco Rubio – bought and paid for by Zionist vulture billionaire Paul Singer, who already profited from the Venezuela operation – talking about US “force posture” near Iran.
As 30-40k US troops are “in reach of thousands of Iranian UAVs and ballistic missiles”, it’s “prudent” to have forces to “defend against what could be (Rubio’s own definition) an Iranian threat”. ende
…………..
whozzin charge of fatboy
