In dialog with Garland https://youtu.be/_3gPHv7H00c  Scott speaks of free speech as though this natural, pre-existing, right, is guaranteed by the First Amendment. He’s mistaken. Napolitano has expressly pointed out that the article “the” precedes the words “free speech. And says that Jefferson insisted that the word “the” be included in the phrase – because the right is a natural right. The amendments prohibit the government from limiting this universal natural right of all men, because this right is created, “granted”, by God. The amendments grant nothing – they are expressly prohibitions, limits on the power of the State.

What Engels described as a “Free State” is a State free of the people, able to do as it pleases with no influence whatsoever from the people. This, to-day, would seem to describe the American State. This precisely is the misapprehension we see, both with Ritter and Nixon, and quite generally, and in the Courts and at the hands of those willing servants of power, of the power to kill, nay, murder at will  – what is available at the whim of the officers who cowardly ignore the Law, the Constitution, and their solemn oaths to defend it. This is the reality and the symbolism of the guns these Quislings tote on their belts, and with which they kill without due remedy, or remorse. “Kill”?, nay, let us say truely, murder.

Safety is Job One!…and “coincidences” happen at lunchtime, don’t they?

https://www.rt.com/india/602936-explosion-pharma-plant-andhra-pradesh/

Secretary Yuvaraj said the initial investigation showed “there was some vapor leak that led to chemical reactions, which caused the explosion.” He identified the solvent involved as methyl tert-butyl ether, a volatile, flammable, and colorless liquid that is primarily used as a fuel additive.

Local media have reported that the workers caught in the blast suffered severe chemical burns. The force of the explosion was so great that the victims’ bodies were reportedly torn apart, and body parts were left scattered at the site.

ENDE

This is by Mike Yeadon. He had been chief scientist for Pfizer. He should know. The Wikipedia is calling him an “anti-vaxxer” 😊

“I’ve seen this dreadful memo once before. I don’t think then I quite grasped the significance of it.

The company (Wyeth) clearly knew or believed that their product (a poison masquerading as a “vaccine”) had been responsible for a cluster of 11 sudden deaths of babies in Tennessee.

I like to think that most of us would react by proposing a recall, informing FDA, taking a briefing from general counsel and getting ready to see some senior resignations. That’s not what happened.

Realising that the cluster of baby deaths had all happened after injection with a single batch of product, and noticing that they hadn’t had similar clusters of deaths in other states, who’d received different batches, somebody had a different idea.

Presumably they didn’t know which batches would be particularly toxic up to that time. They probably didn’t care. The idea was to break up the batches and make sure that a small limit from any batch was delivered to the same state.

That way, it would be impossible for anyone on the outside ever to spot clusters again. Deaths would appear randomly distributed.

This became official policy in 1979.

Recall in 2021, Craig Paardekooper spotting that there were striking relationships between certain lots of the “covid19” “vaccines”, and deaths & serious adverse events (SAEs)? While other lot numbers were associated with few to no deaths and SAEs? This evolved into the “How bad is my batch” website. Sasha Latypova did further analyses, confirming & extending Craig’s original observations. My contribution was limited to immediately realising the importance of the claims. You simply cannot have large variations in toxicity of a properly manufactured product. QED, these were not properly manufactured. At the time, I thought this was evidence of sloppy manufacturing, that they didn’t care about. Having looked further at the data, I revised my take, moving it to intentional variations in what was being put into different batches. Why would that make any sense? Well, if the objective wasn’t therapeutic but to injure & kill, you need to calibrate it. This was the first opportunity to run that calibration. Within a few months, the extreme variability between batches disappeared. Calibration complete. Now the injury & kill rate was known & controlled. I’m sure they could vary it at will, by reference to the findings of the calibration phase.

Looking back at 1979, who knew that “vaccines” were nothing but a deliberately injurious scam? I have no idea. Whatever the answer, it didn’t change much until 2021.

In 1979, I was a school leaver, who’d failed his A levels, working goods inwards at a pharmaceutical plant in Hampshire, England. I sampled the loads lifted into the high bay warehouses and took them to Chemical QC labs, collecting the results labels the next day, attaching them to the various sacks of raw materials. Usually they were green labels, occasionally red. Later, I moved to Production Microbiology, preparing & putting out agar plates to sample air quality near the milk spray driers and swabbing defined places before wiping other plates, placing them in an incubator overnight and counting colonies the next day. I never found excessive bacterial counts. Once I found an insect leg in sampled dried milk and there was hell to pay. The company? Wyeth U.K.

Best wishes
Mike ”

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon/3246

https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/120251

A NATO armored brigade, numbering 4,000 to 5,000 soldiers, will be established near the Russian border in the Finnish city of Mikkeli, according to the newspaper Iltalehti.

The decision is expected to be officially announced in the coming weeks.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics

Previously Sputnik reported that the pair could easily be rescued via Soyuz, but that US political intransigence prevented the US from asking for help during the “election”.

……….

Meantime, tally ho! aerial combat with nazis’ robot airplanes is on the way! https://sputnikglobe.com/20240821/modernized-russian-yak-52-aircraft-to-be-upgraded-to-fight-drones-1119853566.html   Kinna neat, eh? Where’s mah makarov?

The modernized Yak-52 trainer aircraft will be upgraded to combat drones, Dmitry Motin, head of the modernization project at the Aviastroitel Design Bureau, told Sputnik.

“Today, one of the priority projects of our bureau is the modernization of the Yak-52 trainer aircraft into the Yak-52B2 capable of combating UAVs. It is currently waiting for a certificate of airworthiness from Rosaviatsia [Russia’s Federal Air Transport Agency],” he said.

According to him, the aircraft modernization concept includes installing new equipment, including a multi-function display in the rear cockpit.

“Navigation and control equipment, electronic warfare system for jamming communication channels and radar will be modernized,” Dmitry Motin said.

Sal the Sailor Man ice-breakers broken.

(My FWIW technical opinion, general observation, variable pitch props are a whole bucket of trouble waitin’ to go wrong, especially banging along with chunks of ice in frigid water.  Electric motor no like salt, and no like transient torsionals in armateurs, transients in sole-plates make for alignment problems, which lead to more buckets of troubles – most failures in rotating machinery traces to misalignments, steel flexes. )

The United States’ Broken Icebreakers | Commercial Replacement | Shipbuilding Plan? – YouTube

………

Sal also did a recent video on the foundered yacht full of rich guys.

https://youtu.be/fnJYnz7hkMA Ania’s going to move. Goin’ to Rus.