At UNZ see…Filling in Gaps on The Forrestal Case, by Greg Garros  https://www.unz.com/article/filling-in-gaps-on-the-forrestal-case/

Long read, relationship with zionism, and probably murder.

Forrestal’s close associate Mathews :

“What should we Americans do? What should our government do? After all, what Zionists now seek is action, use of official power, by our government to aid them.

The answer is an involved one that calls for restraint on any impulsive action. First, let it be noted that the Zionists seek to use the power of our government to support their movement. That support is meaningless unless it is backed up by the use or the threat of the use of force. If we choose to declare what should be done, we are exercising authority. If we exercise authority, we must expect to be called upon to exercise responsibility. The time has come when our irresponsible role of an international slummer ought to be brought to an end.

When we assume responsibility, we pledge our power. Our power is made up of our men, women, children and wealth and all those other things that go to make up armies and give backing to diplomacy. Thus those who urge Zionist objectives are actually dealing with American lives, pledging those lives to be used in maintaining a refuge for Jews in Palestine against the wishes of the Arabs.”

ende

And so on. An article worth reading.

Thanks E!

………………

Ahem impressed with the near symmetry of the missiles going back to Cuba, free territory in the Americas….

…………….

Zone Tennessee….>

Pure coincidence…. Bad luck fellas…

See what happens Larry? (Walter in Lebowski)

🔴 MASSIVE EXPLOSION – BOMB FACTORY – 19 MISSING – TENNESSEE – LIVE

see…https://youtu.be/055pGjwrvGI

see…https://youtu.be/m8f4YXmCXJQ?t=5

Not quite. Malice aforethought changes homicide to murder, and is proof that the killer (or conspirator) knew that what he (or they) intended to do was wrong.

Was it the blond-cheerleader AG Bondi that has said “the president can do anything he wants”? And Nixon that said “If the president does it, it’s legal”? And the Court that recently ruled that the president is immune from law? Miller’s foolish words merely said the same, but his sudden silence said even more. He revealed malice aforethought.

Naturally I am shocked!

Got cancer? 

All COVID Vaccines Increase Cancer Risk, New Study Concludes • Children’s Health Defense

All COVID Vaccines Increase Cancer Risk, New Study Concludes

If you will accept their cookies…

https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

Learned paper…without the cookies…

1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea – PMC…………

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12465339/

Abstract….

The oncogenic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea, aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences and subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination. In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.

Introductory Statement…

Since the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in December 2019, it has become a global concern because of the lack of preventive and treatment options. It is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is linked to high morbidity and mortality among the elderly [1, 2]. With the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, the fatal complications caused by COVID-19 have been alleviated; however, several other issues, including adverse events related to vaccines have emerged [3–6].

Similar to other viruses, such as human papillomavirus and Epstein–Barr virus, SARS-CoV-2 shows an oncogenic potential, which has been hypothetically proposed based on its mechanisms of action, including the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, viral mutagenicity, and inflammatory cascade [7]. Given the shared structures, such as the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines, we further hypothesized that COVID-19 vaccines might potentially be associated with cancer risks; however, real-world data are insufficient [8]. In this population-based retrospective study, we estimated the cumulative incidences and risks of cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. In the South Korean cohort of 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023, we finally included 595,007 and 2,380,028 individuals after the 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM). For the vaccinated population, 355,896 and 711,792 individuals were included in the non-booster and booster groups, after the 1:2 PSM. The measured outcomes were cumulative incidences and corresponding risks of cancers at one year after COVID-19 vaccination, which was also stratified by the types of vaccine, sex and age (Additional File 1).

Our data showed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased the risk of six cancer types, namely, thyroid (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.51), gastric (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.58), colorectal (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12–1.47), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.25–1.87), breast (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07–1.34), and prostate (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.35–2.11) cancers (Fig. 1 and Additional File 2). In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Meanwhile, vaccinated males were more vulnerable to gastric and lung cancers, whereas vaccinated females were more susceptible to thyroid and colorectal cancers. In terms of age stratification, the relatively younger population (individuals under 65 years) was more vulnerable to thyroid and breast cancers; by comparison, the older population (75 years and older) was more susceptible to prostate cancer (Additional File 3). Booster doses substantially affected the risk of three cancer types in the vaccinated population: gastric and pancreatic cancers (Table 1). Our findings highlighted various cancer risks associated with different COVID-19 vaccine types.

………………………

Conclusion(s)

…conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancer types, including thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Notably, this COVID-19 vaccination-associated cancer risk was likely more elevated among individuals aged ≤ 65 years except in individuals with prostate cancer. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.

Do look at the full paper….nifty graphs!

“twat” is not in my lexicon…so I looked it up. One of the several meanings seems about right! We might qualify the term with “pretentious”, imho 😉 Ahspose he sees hizzself as speaking with gravitas…

……………..

In other affairs, somewhat kinetic…

Comrade Borzzikman  “S-500 ‘PROMETHEUS’ Shot down Seven Previously Unknown British Missiles over the Crimean Bridge”  His august royalness must be havin’ conniption fits…

see….https://youtu.be/kQMJ0-DWryA?t=2   (that’s good shootin’, soldier! (General Ripper))

and

Killzone🔴Uspenivka Defense Falls💥🏚️Intense Battle At Kostiantynivka And Kupiansk⚔️MS For 2025.10.08  says Military Summary…see…https://youtu.be/QrrCxAA0auc?t=1

Yeah, I distrust Gilbert…, and Mac too…even if they’re sincere, their class pretensions or affiliations seem false. The old IWW used to say that the employing class and the working class have nothing in common. I’m skeptical about unequivocal statements like that, but they do have a point. Academies exist, in measure, to capture and bring to heel otherwise dangerous intellectuals… and so I tend to distruct westzone academics…in a small way our amusing fellow Sal, who fancies himself an historian (!) and Doctorow being a pair of examples. There are “rogue” intellectuals, however…and they never get tenure, and seldom even get hired….they find work in other areas…

G2mil insanity in westpac …

Oldtime, The Quiet Mutiny… Pilger’s inspiring report… zone vietnam…

…Uncle Gilbert says stuff with which I tend to disagree…I tend to think that Putin’s trying to get Strategic Timing just right, using time to prepare while zone nazi further decays…if Danny’s guest is right, and I think he is, then Gilbert’s observations become irrelevant…the war will be upon us all “as found”…and Putin will be running it…at least in the opening phases…