Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 06 Aug 2024 #37959
    manderson
    Participant

    The MoonofAlabama highlights this piece by Tarik Cyril Amar. https://x.com/TarikCyrilAmar/status/1818580601219293405

    The thesis of which is:

    “Gaza is a Method. I intuitively agreed: It is obvious that the mass murder in Gaza outlines a pattern, a set of tools and measures of extermination, subjugation, and expulsion that are ready for export and will be in high demand – just like so much else of Israel’s spying, policing (if that is the word), and murder skills and tech have always been.”

    Only a matter of time before this is used in the West on its own citizens.

    in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 06 Aug 2024 #37956
    manderson
    Participant

    True, I think Postol and martyanov agree on the state of US elites doing strategy. And I agree with you, the miscalculation thinking the Russians do not see launches at sea when they actually can is very very dangerous. martyanov did his thesis on ASW so he’d know. Based on Martyanov’s blog, it seems he communicates with postol, so some professional disagreement. I would think that OTH radar is preferable and more defendable than satellites anyway.

    in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 06 Aug 2024 #37899
    manderson
    Participant

    Also martyanov has some thoughts on Ted Postol’s strategic ideas on ballistic missiles if you search his blog for “postol”. Here’s one. https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/06/responding-to-ted-postols-thesis.html

    Still Postol provides a useful US perspective on the issue.

    in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 06 Aug 2024 #37898
    manderson
    Participant

    Very interesting info RE hypersonics Mr P and Amarynth. I have always found it interesting that Andrei Martyanov says that Russia’s hypersonics are fully shoot and forget, which means that once they have received their target’s general area, they have active seeker capability, likely including imaging in some part of the spectrum to identify the target in the general area of the coordinates given at launch (e.g., by image correlation, which is how the houthis do some of their drone targeting).

    in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 01 Aug 2024 #37832
    manderson
    Participant

    Alastair Crooke in his most recent video/column notes that Israel is split not only by the apartheid that so far has been the definitive aspect of Israel, but also between secular/commercial jews (Israel) and settlers (Judea). This split is not the same as secular vs religious, where many ultra orthodox are not armed. The settlers are an armed group which Alastair suggests could march on Tel Aviv for a coup d’état if any Israeli government tries to settle with the Palestinians or agree to a two state solution. Indeed, as I noted before, the insistence on the internationally recognized and legally rock solid “two state solution” seems to be exactly the wedge that forces Israel to destroy ITSELF as it’s radicals cannot reckon with the weakness of their state relative to Lebanon/Iran.

    in reply to: Africa #37616
    manderson
    Participant

    Privately-held debt also got Argentina in trouble and proved much harder to default on than IMF debt. Ethiopia stopped payment to the IMF for three years, essentially defaulting. When Argentina attempted similar re-negotiations with US bankers holding their debt there were many hold outs and then many many lawsuits and essentially non-stop demands to pay full price plus damages. Public bond issues (private debt) can be worse for nations because there’s no single entity to negotiate with and no way to declare bankruptcy.

    Fortunately, Russia has started its own credit rating agency for exactly this reason. These US rating agencies also rate Russia as junk, despite glowing world bank reports, so clearly biased. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/russian-ratings-agency-acra-sees-portfolio-growing-as-foreigners-leave-idUSKBN19P1VB/

    in reply to: Africa #37331
    manderson
    Participant

    As AHH posted about, the IMF finalized a loan deal with Egypt.

    Also yesterday, the IMF finalized a loan deal with Ethiopia. Ethiopia has good relations with China and Russia, but also with the US and Italians (despite prior wars). Still Ethiopians are a proud people and will not stand for being held back. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/ethiopia-s-imf-deal-paves-way-for-debt-restructuring-official-says/ar-BB1qSyoz

    This IMF deal doesn’t seem too bad, we’ll see if the interest rate / free floating currency becomes a problem.

    in reply to: Africa #37083
    manderson
    Participant

    The article by Marat Khairullin regarding the Africa Front and the development goals in the Sahel and north Africa is great news to hear. https://sovereignista.com/2024/07/27/the-african-front/

    So Togo to Somaliland will be the route for cross-Africa travel. I am glad Russia is leading this effort, including integration and building of banks and a customs union. Africa already has a customs union and a visa free union, but they don’t work, from what I’ve read. Of course, several contingency plans were also hinted at (in Sudan and Senegal) so I guess the route is subject to change / expansion.

    This is not where I would have wanted the second front to be at this moment since gaza is more urgent, but Marat is right that the amount of suffering visited on all of Africa by the West is immense and lengthy. Of course one of the larger suppliers of arms to Rwanda was also Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/records-of-israeli-arms-sales-during-rwandan-genocide-to-remain-sealed/

    in reply to: Africa #35675
    manderson
    Participant

    Garland Nixon, Andrei martyanov and Scott Ritter discuss Africa extensively in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAnlWg5kWpM

    Garland points out that Chad and Senegal want to join the three AES countries. Scott points out that Algeria is already part of the larger security arrangement. I think Russia is also moving into Libya. Sudan is also mentioned, but not so much as part of AES+. I’ve outlined these on the map below. This is an African security concept, but it has an economic aspect as well. This is separate from BRICS and SCO I think. In any case, I have underlined the countries mentioned in the map below.

    Sahel AES+

    in reply to: Chronicles of the Apocalypse – 10 July 2024 #35603
    manderson
    Participant

    Right, Orlov seemed think that the hybrid nature of this war has been kicked up a notch. Many plants in the US have gone up in smoke since the war started. The NATO summit talked 360 defense quite a bit and I had not seen that before. Do they mean they need to watch their backs / rear? The NATO declaration also speaks of hybrid war. This may be one of the ways the war is expanding (together with Russia supplying arms to friends like Syria and Cuba).

    in reply to: Africa #34959
    manderson
    Participant
    in reply to: Africa #34351
    manderson
    Participant

    Thank you for the maps and the updates on Kenya. I had no idea that the US was now funding Kenya via CHIPS act and NATO. The NATO designation for Kenya is big. Colombia was recently designated in part I think because so many mercenaries come from there and several training camps are there, it makes it easier for ITAR and other regulations if they are designated. Maybe they are planning the same type of mercenary bases for Kenya. This might not be to train mercs to destabilize Africa but more as a recruitment hub for all of Africa so they can then be sent elsewhere. I believe Colombian mercs have been killed in Gaza and Ukraine.

    Here’s some more maps of UAE DP world projects in Africa.

    DP World North

    DP-world

    DP world also won the contract for expanding the Berbera port in Somaliland for Ethiopia/Somaliland. Here is their plan for that:

    Berbera

    in reply to: Africa #33686
    manderson
    Participant

    Ah ok, makes sense thanks!

    in reply to: Africa #33633
    manderson
    Participant

    Thank you AHH for the update on Sudan. Their country has such a long sad history. Unsurprisingly, divisions which the English made worse during colonialism. Last time I had looked at the conflict it was unclear how the sides were aligned. Now it seems Russia at least is sure who they are supporting. What confuses me is that there are two names for the opposition Rapid Support Forces and Rapid Reaction Forces. As far as I know the Rapid Support Forces are the rebels here in this civil war, and interestingly, they were trained by Wagner. They are mercenaries and deemed terrorists now by the Sudanese government. This is different from prior sudanese civil wars which had a north-south component and a christian-muslim component. It appears the Sudanese govt decided that the RSF should be disarmed and disbanded (given their history of atrocities). Even though they once served the Sudanese govt they had become a problem and were hated in the south. It is interesting that Russia is now siding against the ex-wagner trained para-militaries. This is certainly the correct choice given that the sudanese govt is the lawful, recognized govt of sudan.

    On the other hand, the rapid reaction force (RRF) is also a para-military body but composed of nations of the African Union. It is possible that the RRF is causing problems in Sudan alongside the RSF, but maybe the RU Ambassador meant RSF not RRF. The AU RRF (also called the ASF) is deployed across the eastern Sahel and could be slightly western aligned by not as much as ECOWAS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Standby_Force The two primary militaries in the RRF/ASF for this region are Ethiopia and Nigeria. The RU ambassador’s article is here: https://afrinz.ru/en/2024/06/on-confronting-western-neo-colonialism-article-by-andrey-chernovol-russian-ambassador-to-sudan/

    It might just be bad translations too. For example, this key sentence doesn’t make sense: “Их силовое прикрытие и политический партнер по аддис-абебскому соглашению — СБР (военизированная организация «Силы быстрого реагирования» — «АИ»), на 80% укомплектованные иностранными наемниками. ” “Their force cover and political partner in the Addis Ababa agreement is the SIS (paramilitary organisation “Rapid Reaction Force” – “AI”), 80% staffed by foreign mercenaries.” I am just not sure who the ambassador is talking about (whether SIS / RRF / or AI), or what relevance the Addis Adaba agreement from the first sudanese civil war has with any of these groups including RSF and AU. Anyway, still very confusing to me.

    Nevertheless, it appears Russia is working to help the sudanese govt fight these terrorists (the RSF) and that’s great news. Last I had heard only saudi arabia and UAE were trying to do something to settle things.

    in reply to: Africa #32762
    manderson
    Participant

    Right, I think that after 30+ years in power, it is good for ANC to do some reflection. The Zuma party is quite new so we’ll have to watch and see where they go. It seems good for countries to have parties like Zuma on the left of the main party (ANC), even if the main party is rather people focused. Zuma also made statements that suggested they were not willing to form a coalition party; likely they want to continue to push the ANC corruption angle.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)