Maria Zakharova: On Europe’s demands to not play a secondary role in any Ukraine Peace Negotiations
The head of the Italian Foreign Ministry, reacting to a telephone conversation between Russian and US Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, expressed the opinion that Europe should not play a “secondary role” in the negotiations on Ukraine.
(Here is the opinion expressed: https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/138716)
There is no emoji to convey the whole range of emotions, so words will have to do. 👇
Let me remind you that it was the leaders of the EU countries – German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande – who recently openly stated that they had no intention of implementing the Minsk Agreements, although they had previously assured the world otherwise. Now their official position is that the Minsk Agreements were an attempt to rearm Kiev and “give it time.”
That is, they pretended to be working conscientiously in the Ukrainian direction, but in reality they were engaged in harmful pantomime.
The problem is not only that they lied – everyone is already used to that. The problem is that they betrayed the interests of Europe, and this betrayal is one of the reasons for the tragedy.
The Minsk agreements became part of the system of international law through their approval by the UN Security Council. This means that they were subject to mandatory implementation.
Both Hollande and Merkel, and of course the Italian leadership knew this perfectly well then and understand it today. Having violated international law, which they now openly admit, the EU members became key accomplices in the catastrophe that unfolded in Ukraine, and as a result of their own actions they received an armed conflict on the European continent. If the Minsk norms had been implemented, this would have saved Ukraine, and at the same time would have eased the current unenviable situation of the citizens of the European Union, whose well-being has significantly declined due to the erroneous, and sometimes simply criminal, steps of their leaders.
If we look even deeper, all this was not only their personal betrayal, but also a reflection of the complete loss of independence in conducting a “sovereign” foreign policy. The European Union as an integration association and almost all of its member states have become an addition to NATO, obediently following and following instructions from Washington. In this regard, the situation around the sabotage and “investigations” on the “Nord Streams” is more than indicative.
In confirmation of the above, NATO Secretary General Rutte made an unclear comment about whether Putin’s phone call with Trump was a “betrayal of Ukraine” by the West or not. Both the question and the answer are insignificant.
I repeat: Westerners betrayed Ukraine when they prevented its democratic transition, the strengthening of its independence, when they interfered in internal affairs, set Ukrainians against Russians, set Slavs against Slavs, then initiated an unconstitutional coup and deceived that they were fulfilling the Minsk agreements, and then provoked a massacre in the region.
Zakharova had an amusing remark about the space in current Ukraine that the, e.g., western mercenaries could occupy … I think it was 1 m x 2 m and about 1 m deep.
As with all things, the battlefield will determine the outcome. Russia may allow relations to be called “negotiations” in the same way that it used the term “partners” but this is nothing other than the “non-ultimatum” ultimatum that we saw prior to the start of the military operation. Russia will… Read more »
Interesting times. The time of monsters, morons, liver sausages, Tabaquis, and garden-dwelling cowardly rabbits. That Trump called Putin is the first step in the Outlaw Empire’s capitulation. Russia will win all the terms in their pre-SMO non-ultimatum ultimatum: demilitarisation, denazification, de-Nato-isation, indivisible security for all. This is the first time… Read more »
Yes, let the big dogs talk, and the Chihuahuas can stay in the corner and whimper. And pee on the floor, probably.
Why should you involve a party in negotiations that has flouted previous bargaining outcomes? You could say the same of the US, but given the changing of the guard and the size of the player, it makes sense that you do sit down with them. In fact, with its role… Read more »
“with its role as a negotiating partner, the U.S. now acknowledges that it is at war with Russia” Yes. This is the best outcome of ongoing US moves. They’re no longer in denial but by extension also accept what must come next, as the leader of the losing side. But… Read more »
Wish I shared your optimism. Trump is disingenuous to the extreme, in my opinion. He’s just not believable, regardless of what he says, except that the basic principles of US hegemony are weaved into every utterance of his. Those principles are that every natural resource that the US knows about,… Read more »
I think a “settlement” will be achieved but how it is spun in the west will be pro Trump which of course will always be lies as he is exactly as you describe. I doubt Putin would be even commenting to this degree if he didn’t already know there would… Read more »