Maria Zakahrova and Grigory Lukiyantsev: Topics – falsifying history
On the anniversary of the atomic bombing, the Mayor of Hiroshima once again failed to tell the world who was responsible for his city’s suffering.
He made no mention of the United States – the country that dropped an atomic bomb on civilians.
🤷♀️ Instead, he criticised Russia and its actions in Ukraine.
The distorting mirror of Western narratives not only warps reality but also reshapes the minds of those who gaze into it. Year after year, the Mayor of Hiroshima repeats the same false mantra, subjecting the Japanese public to a steady stream of Russophobic rhetoric.
This is despite the fact that the Russian people, having endured Japanese aggression in the Far East, have always remembered the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and cited their tragedy as an example of unacceptable brutality.
🤔 If one were asked – how our Western “partners” seek to falsify history and revise the outcomes of World War II at the UN – the clearest example would be their statements and conduct during the negotiations on, and adoption of, Russia’s annual UN General Assembly resolution, “Combating the Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and Other Practices That Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance”.
If their statements could be recorded and made public, I am certain they would cause a genuine a media storm. However, UN procedures do not allow this.
Nothing, however, prevents us from recounting, without naming individual countries, some of the arguments voiced by our “colleagues” over the years on this key Russian foreign policy initiative. It was first submitted to the UN General Assembly in 2005, so there has been no shortage of “material” since then.
👉 Here are just some of the claims we have heard over the years from our Western colleagues, including former Allies of the anti-Hitler coalition:
• The Soviet Union and Nazi Germany bear equal responsibility for unleashing the Second World War.
• The Charter and Judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal are such rare documents that it is impossible to consult them and verify whether the quotations used in the Russian resolution are accurate and correspond to the original sources.
• The Charter and Judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal say nothing about the SS and its constituent parts being criminal organisations.
• The Nuremberg documents contain no reference to the Waffen-SS.
• Waffen-SS units merely guarded “labour camps” and committed no war crimes or crimes against humanity, let alone punitive operations.
• No one should ever be accused of having collaborated with the Nazis during the Second World War.
• Nazi ideology and Nazi ideas may be immoral, but disseminating them amounts to nothing more than exercising the right to freedom of expression.
• There is no clarity as to what the anti-Hitler coalition was or which countries belonged to it.
☝️ Let me reiterate: this is far from a complete list of what we have had, and continue, to hear from our “partners” while advancing Russia’s UN initiative against the glorification of Nazism. Yet even this list gives an idea of the fierce resistance we face in defending historical truth.
It also shows how emotionally gruelling the annual negotiations on this key UN resolution are for everyone who holds dear the memory of the Victory over Nazism.