Chronicles - Sovereign Global Majority

Archives

‼️ Michael Hudson: Note 2 on the planned Alaska meeting

The discussion and the thinking continue:  Note 1 is here

Putin started this year’s meetings with Trump by saying that the root of their problems is not Ukraine. Ukraine is only an arena in the fight by NATO (led by the US) against Russia, China, and their BRICS and Global South allies.

To solve the fighting in Ukraine, the expansion of NATO must end. That is what Putin demands.

But there seems to be zero chance of this developing. Even if Trump stops US support of NATO’s war in Ukraine, NATO’s roots in the EU bureaucracy (von der Lehen and KK), Britain under Starmer and MI6, Germany under Merz and the Bundeswehr trying to become the new Wehrmacht, and Macron’s France are acting on their own, almost instinctive hatred of Russia.

So there is little chance of agreement, certainly over Russia’s demand that the West recognize its imminent military victory and ability to create a postwar shrunken Ukraine.

NATO has just intruded into the Caucasus with Azerbaijan and Armenia, with US control of the Zangezur Corridor threatening Iran and also China’s Belt and Road trajectory.

And the US has withdrawn from the last vestiges of atomic arms control, while sending nuclear submarines nearer to Russia in at least a symbolically threatening move.

This reflects the Neocon demand for U.S. unipolar hegemony, preventing any country from having its own sovereignty to act independently of the United States.

So my guess is that at the upcoming meetings, the United States has only one tactic – and it is a tactic that Trump loves for his own psychological purposes:

America has only one thing to offer other countries: the (temporary) promise NOT to hurt them. There’s nothing positive to offer, given its de-industrialization and the world’s de-dollarization. (Has Germany ever begun to get back its gold reserves left on deposit with the New York Fed?)

Trump’s generals (the hardest-liner is now in Kiev) and EU/NATO are urging more and tougher sanctions against Russia, mainly to fall on the EU and BRICS countries.

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr P
6 months ago

Stan’s got a reasonable apprehension. (In the Eyes of Truth Update 10.08.2025 Is Alaska a decapitation operation. How can anyone trust USA?). One might imagine that the junta kills two birds with one stone, and blames the Russians…recalling the Hitler plot..a twist is that the junta blows the place to… Read more »

Minh
Minh
6 months ago

Guys, a dying empire is always at its most dangerous. US won’t go quietly into oblivion. It still has one trick up its sleeve: the dollar, its most potent weapon. Yes, it’s the dollar, not those overrated nukes. I came across an article the other week, and it’s frightening. Given… Read more »

AHH
AHH
6 months ago
Reply to  amarynth

“the dead stop to a BRICS currency came from India” Yes I heard too.  India has played a perfidious role throughout BRICS – for example delaying the expansion of the INSTC by delaying the contractual expansion of Chabahar port in Iran, and other investments. All these moves on behalf of… Read more »

emersonreturn
6 months ago
Reply to  AHH

india may be discovering that her lover played her, disgraced her & left her re-arranging her sari in hopes of disguising a swollen belly…where she coulda shoulda been wife number one, now she will be fortunate indeed to be wife number three or four. it’s a good thing she’s pretty… Read more »

Minh
Minh
6 months ago
Reply to  amarynth

Thx Amarynth! We’re on the same page when it comes to the dollar and the need for BRICS to break away from it as much as it can. Let me clarify some of my points. Stablecoin in itself is not the problem. It’s just a medium, like a copper wire… Read more »

Colin Maxwell
Colin Maxwell
6 months ago
Reply to  Minh

My 2-cent’s worth on the much anticipated BRICS “currency”. Firstly, I think we need to bin the term “currency” and change the label to “instrument” or a name such as “Unit” or something of that nature. Macro-economics and the world of trade have entered uncharted territory, and as such, the… Read more »

emersonreturn
6 months ago
Reply to  Colin Maxwell

thanks for sharing this, dear col. cheers & blessings, em.

AHH
AHH
6 months ago

“America has only one thing to offer other countries: the (temporary) promise NOT to hurt them.”

Having lost military supremacy, lagging in innovation, means and MIC, the worm is turning though. Soon that may be the only offer available in turn… 

these are their last days to drop barbarism

AHH
AHH
6 months ago

The fearful Goldfinger announces the Capitulation will now be held in Moscau….. or did his bipolar slip through the cracks. A different script for each day!

Rob D
6 months ago
Reply to  amarynth

Largely agree with your points, amarynth. Looking for ‘good moves’? I can think of two, but I’m just guessing. First, we assume that this meeting is about Ukraine. Maybe the main subject isn’t about Ukraine at all, and the meeting is e.g. mainly about the future security architecture of the… Read more »

Biggus Dickus
Biggus Dickus
6 months ago
Reply to  amarynth

If the US (any faction) takes out Putin (99% unlikely), the US and the NATO will be wiped out within hours. Period.

Russia will continue to exist even if they get a few hits.