Iran : how many ways to kill a cat?

By Amarynth

There is more than one way to kill a cat.  Iran is the cat.  False narratives from the US are again taking over the media sphere everywhere.

Geopolitically there is but one question.  This question is:

who wants to own iran?

Once one fights your way out of the media sphere, and out of the deep and dark underbelly of claims and counterclaims, intelligence plants and hissy fits, the answer becomes clear.

The US (empire as a whole) wants to own the oil, but not really own Iran.

They like their Venezuela model where they take what they want and leave the country to do its own thing.  What an easy task for empire.  They sit back and demand fealty and force tribute.  Good work if you can get it.

Besides the US, here is the list of possibles in terms of Who Wants to Own Iran.  Let say at this stage that this forms a few new fronts against Iran, their sovereignty and their independent pride as a nation.  It is also causing great harm and distrust within the Iranian civilization itself, as partially the joint solidarity, collective unity and engagement is clearly taking a knock.  The trust in the leaders is eroding.

This is not new strategy.  The US is very good at it.  They use negotiations and media to cause this distrust because they will not admit that they’ve lost the war.  They will want to call it a win in some way or another.  Even a technical knockout will do.   From SmoothieX12, we have this apt statement.

Matt Kroenig has wanted the U.S. to attack Iran for more than a decade. Now that he got the war he wanted and it failed, he is reduced to arguing this: 

To be sure, the United States did not register a knockout punch against the Islamic Republic, but to continue the boxing metaphor, it did win on points.

War isn’t a sport, and there is no winning on “points.” The ghouls that cheered this war on treat war as if it were a video game where you get more “points” with every person you kill or maim. How many “points” did the U.S. get from massacring the innocent schoolgirls in Minab with missiles? If the U.S. won, as Kroenig insists, what did we win? What does the U.S. have now that it didn’t have before?

Who else is making false statements?  Why, Pakistan of course.  

In a shocking statement, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif claims that Iran has agreed to hold negotiations on its ballistic missile program in the future.

A few days later after the US picked this up this planted cue, and saturated the media with it, he changed his mind.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif:  ‘This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles.  It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda.  Iran’s side never wanted to even discuss about it.’

I’m giving you one example.  There are many more.  OK, one more, for fun and knowing that the nuclear file for Iran is not included in the current MoU.

IAEA director: We know where Iran’s highly enriched uranium is, but Iran must inform us of its location.  The IAEA Secretary General, Rafael Grossi, says he will soon hold talks with Iran to determine ‘dates for inspections’.

This comes despite Iran denying that it has agreed to IAEA inspections.

Who else wants to own Iran?  There is a list and here it is:

These are the ones that are forming a bloc:  Qatar, in order to get out of its current problems, Egypt, in order to remain relevant, Turkiye, in order to also be there in case there are some war profits to be made, Saudi Arabia to protect their position in the region.

Who else wants to own Iran?  Why, the zionists of course.   

New Israeli spy chief plots Iran regime-change — again?

The new Mossad boss Roman Gofman has a new strategy to bring down the Iranian government, Israeli newspaper Maariv reports.  Now Gofman wants to “transform parts of the agency” and try again.

There is a feeding frenzy out there.  It is common after wars for others to try and pick up the pieces.  We pray that the cat is truly catfoot.  This all needs to be seen in terms of an almost relentless move to multipolarity currently.  These sleazy wanna-be middle-countries are jostling for position because of their very skewed perception of what multipolarity and multilateralism is.  Hillary Clinton said one thing that made sense – she talked about the deplorables, a word that is apt for now.

All I want, is for Iran and its people to own Iran.

This all needs to be seen in terms of an almost relentless move to multipolarity currently.  These sleazy middle-countries are jostling for position because in their failed thinking, they still think it is a ladder to climb.

There is a good note to end on.

Ghalibaf, head of Iran’s negotiating team:
Iran envisions the region’s future in engagement, not confrontation; and In indigenous and common security, not imported solutions, not from other countries.

— IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) (@iribnews_irib) June 24, 2026