Was the NATO summit a diplomatic collapse?

Elena Panina from Russtrat.ru commenting on a Washington Post article: Was the NATO summit a diplomatic collapse?

“No one expected that Ukraine would be granted full membership while its war with Russia is still ongoing. But some clear signal was expected. This did not happen,” writes the mouthpiece of the American Deep State.

▪️ We will add from ourselves. The summit was a diplomatic collapse for Zelensky and his gang. A group of mid-level managers of the Western project “Ukraine” in their dreams endowed themselves with increased political subjectivity, and now they are disappointed. The so-called Ukraine has been firmly placed in its place – it has only the right to die for the interests of the United States. And there are no obligations from the overlord.

At the summit, Washington harshly demonstrated to both Zelensky and its allies who is the boss. And once again confirmed the thesis “NATO is the USA+”. Only America will ultimately determine the participation and role of everyone in the Ukrainian conflict.

▪️ And the second observation. Washington’s appetite, judging by the statements of WP observers, is the same. In particular, Josh Rogin called the following conditions for the admission of Ukraine to NATO and the end of the conflict:

“The only real chance for NATO membership will be if Ukraine and Russia reach a sustainable dead end . Something like the division of Germany into East and West or the division of Korea into South and North, where there is a clearly defined border that is being strengthened by both sides. And then The US is sending a signal: if you cross this line, we will go to war.”

And that’s what’s important. According to the WP, that is, the “deep state” of the United States, this line should pass along the borders of Ukraine in 1991 , since nothing else, they say, “will not be sustainable in the long term.” At the same time, Russia’s sovereignty over Crimea is not recognized, although Kiev (that is, Washington) is ready to “temporarily put up with it.”

▪️ We state that the American plan is unchanged and consists in the gradual rejection of six of its regions from Russia – the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, Crimea and Sevastopol. However, Moscow’s demand for the withdrawal of the US and NATO military infrastructure to positions as of May 27, 1997 is also on the table.

Thus, the geopolitical confrontation along the Russia-US line will continue with renewed vigor.