Chronicles - Sovereign Global Majority

Archives

History: Book Review – Grover Furr’s Khrushchev Lied

Grover Furr’s Khrushchev Lied is perhaps one of the most important books of the 21st century.  Khrushchev’s calumny was the fountainhead of revisionism and the rollback of many Communist movements across the globe.

From our friends at the Greanville Post

Khrushchev Lied, first published in 2011, is definitely the most emblematic work of Grover Furr, an American Professor of Medieval English Literature at Montclair State University who has devoted years of research on Stalin-era Soviet Union.

Before going to the book itself, it is significant to underline that Furr isn’t an ordinary historian who relies on the dominant narratives and “sacred truths” of bourgeois historiography. On the contrary, he carefully challenges those narratives and “truths”, applying a dialectical approach on history and seeking for the actual facts one by one, usually using an enormous list of thoroughly-searched, primary and secondary, sources.

In Khrushchev Lied, Professor Furr deals with the speech that arguably exerted the greatest political influence in the 20th century, namely, the notorious “Secret Speech” delivered by Nikita Khrushchev at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The significance of this speech lies in the fact that it actually became the basis for the launch of a huge campaign of slander, both of Joseph Stalin, and of the cause of socialism-communism more broadly.

The accusations that Khrushchev launched against Stalin and other leading figures of the USSR – such as, for example, Lavrentiy Beria – were skillfully utilized by the bourgeois staffs of the West, within the context of the Cold War, for the massive discrediting of the existing socialism of the 20th century. Furthermore, through the polemic against the Stalinist period, Khrushchev and his close associates justified a series of decisions taken at the 20th Congress, which in essence constituted the opportunist turn of the CPSU and the subsequent abandonment of socialist construction. After all, the 20th Congress of the CPSU was the key point in the USSR’s gradual path towards capitalist restoration, which was openly manifested with the counterrevolutionary upheavals in the late 1980s.

In his book, Grover Furr examines Khrushchev’s accusations against Stalin one by one, using extensive documentary evidence drawn from newly accessible Soviet primary sources. The fundamental conclusion of the book is, to say the least, striking: Not a single one of Khrushchev’s allegations against Stalin is confirmed. On the contrary, according to the evidence presented in detail by Furr, Khrushchev deliberately lied, sometimes concealing historical facts and sometimes distorting them. Khrushchev Lied doesn’t reveal that Nikita Sergeyevich simply exaggerated or misrepresented the so-called “Stalin’s crimes” but that Khrushchev knowingly lied, fabricating false narratives to shift blame, discredit Stalinist policies and consolidate his own power.

One could argue that Furr is biased against Khrushchev or that he is trying to exonerate Stalin from the accusations against him. This does not seem to be the case in this book. Furr quotes the excerpts from the “Secret Speech” verbatim and then proceeds to refute the Soviet leader’s arguments step by step. Chapter by chapter, the author unravels the tangle of Khrushchev’s lies, using a vast array of historical sources, both Russian and Western. Even if someone has reservations about the author’s methodological approach, the outcome is truly impressive. The evidence presented by Furr seems indisputable and the impression the reader gets is that Nikita Khrushchev was, indeed, a shameless liar. However, he was not born a liar, nor a revisionist, nor a traitor to the cause of socialism-communism. Khrushchev, like other leaders like him, was the product of an era and a process that deserve to be studied even more extensively, so that relevant conclusions can be drawn about the past, present, and future of the communist movement.

Available at the Internet Archive:  https://archive.org/details/khrushchev-lied

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hank
Hank
4 months ago

I have posted this before – but it is worth repeating. The lies in real time about Russia/Putin (who has died of cancer many times)/the war in Ukraine should push any serious historian to reevaluate the official history of the 20th century anti-imperialists such as Mao, Stalin, Fidel and so… Read more »

Last edited 4 months ago by Hank
Steve from oz
Steve from oz
4 months ago

Thanks amarynth, this is valuable material. I first realised the extent to which Stalin had been slandered when I came across his written works at the Marxists Internet Archive. He wrote political and philosophical tracts that few Western leaders today would have the intellectual capacity to follow. And his output… Read more »

Snow Leopard
Snow Leopard
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve from oz

One archive item regarding Stalin that I fond paradigm shattering was a report that Stalin planned to introduce a system of Socialist Democracy to Russia. He advocated it a Central Committee Meeting. Stalin stuck to democratic principle within that meeting. His proposal was to the effect that the Communist Party… Read more »

Steve from oz
Steve from oz
4 months ago
Reply to  Snow Leopard

His idea sounds similar to the Chinese model.
A model that has been so successful.

Mr P
4 months ago
Reply to  Snow Leopard

Was this in Furr> “Stalin planned to introduce a system of Socialist Democracy to Russia. < ?? I find this claim especially interesting. Where do we find records of this proposal? It seems to me that the principle applies generally, bourgeoisie develops and attempts to dominate the state for its own… Read more »

Snow Leopard
Snow Leopard
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr P

Hello P. I came across this in my perusal of Furr’s investigations. He has made the most of his access to the original Soviet archives that are now accessible. So it was something that Furr dug up out of the archives. That is the best my memory can offer. My… Read more »

Mr P
4 months ago
Reply to  Snow Leopard

Thanks. I was not clear. I did not intend to imply that Stalin attempted to surrender socialism to a bourgeoisie, but that one had already formed in the guise of the Central Committee, and that he seems to have failed to recognise this. He perhaps faced the dilemma of quis… Read more »

Snow Leopard
Snow Leopard
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr P

Dear P: I appreciate your perspective. I find wisdom in your comments. You speak of the timeless tragedy that faces all who seek to govern a body of people who are asleep to their real Selves. It must feel to be a deadly trap. As I imagine Nico Cost might… Read more »