Capture of the Eagle S vessel: false pretext?

This is from the channel ‘Two Majors’ and they ask the right questions. Was the capture of this ship for supposedly breaking the internet cables between Finland and Estonia done under false pretext?

https://news.err.ee/1609561090/estonia-dispatches-navy-patrol-boat-to-guard-estlink-1-cable

On the consequences of the capture of the Eagle S vessel

In fact, we have to agree (https://t.me/SeaPower/4112) with our colleagues that this incident with the Eagle S vessel will have far-reaching consequences for our communications in the Baltic Sea.

The seizure of a tanker under a false pretext is a tactic that NATO countries have been practicing for the past two years. Regular exercises were held in the Baltic Sea, and the main task was to practice actions in a crisis situation. Like the one that was recorded between Finland and Estonia.

No Western country will investigate whether this actually happened or not. Whether this tanker was involved or not. It doesn’t matter to the West anymore . They have a pretext for new aggression. We do not rule out at all that the Finns themselves organized this cable break. Who will prove otherwise?

There have been many exercises of this kind. For example, the last one was Pikne, with the participation of Estonians, Finns, British – well, you get the idea. And underwater coastal operations were practiced there. Last year, under the same unknown pretext, a naval group of the “ United Expeditionary Forces ” was created.

Now, in addition to the sanctions that will clearly be imposed on, as the European Union now calls it, Russia’s “shadow fleet”, we should also expect more dangerous steps from the point of view of Russia’s position in the Baltics, such as more serious provocations. Why?

At a minimum, to justify an increased presence at sea and to escort civilian ships coming from Russia, and, at a maximum, to block the bay and allow ships through only with their permission.