The new war: Syria ripped the veil
Syria tore the veil in more ways than one. We have spoken about how the War on BRICS will appear and we have talked about chaos being a methodology. Dr Michael Hudson calls it ‘controlled anarchy’ It is one thing talking about the signs of this war, and another to see those signs manifesting.
We now see the chaos and the anarchy and we know how this war is materializing. We see everywhere in the world chaos being perpetrated. This is how we recognize the war. We see the war by virtue of the peoples of this world being just unable to stop a genocide. We also see the depth of the destabilization that is still ongoing in Georgia for example. While initially I thought that Georgia was only a small event, I now know that we can learn from that. Even this small event became an empire war. They have to win every little thing that they can. But that is another topic.
We see the war where we see destabilization with no care for humanity. Recognize it! That is the litmus.
I am incensed, totally and completely incensed at the behavior of those that call themselves resistance. We have internal fights breaking out everywhere. Good and ‘realism journalists’ are accusing each other of perfidy. Others are writing of how Mr.Putin lied in his Direct Line communication. We have lost one battle and this resistance is making themselves fall apart by senseless and useless internal strife, shouting over one another in one fiery youtube after the other. All because they cannot see that we’ve simply lost a battle. An important battle but nevertheless ONE battle. Somebody somewhere had to deliver a victory and because this is a loss, they were seemingly deprived, the crying babies! Everyone is at odds with everyone else, having forgotten a pragmatic and an anlytical approach. Putin must supply them with a win. Assad must supply them with a win, while in their own countries they cannot change anything.
There is a very dark underbelly of this fight. At the end I’ll post a discussion from Dimitri Lascaris. We have my favorite litmus test American that is condemning the ‘Arabs’. The armchair soldiers wanted to see a fight and they are bellyaching because they were deprived of a fight. They wanted to see Syria win, as Russia wins every day on the battlefield. It is nice to see a win, but we have to get used to losing, because lose at times, we will. It is fine to say the empire are all stupid, but what we have seen just now proves that they are not stupid. The ones that sit as talking heads on the various programs, are stupid. The ones that call the shots, are not. Again, we are in a war that we can see no end to at the moment, and this war is full-spectrum. Perhaps these people will calm down after fighting, but at the moment they are making the loss worse.
Now specifically to those that are stomping around on their youtubes and condemning Assad, and condemning the Arabs and condemning anyone that they can think of that did not supply a win for them personally so that they can feel good: You have no right to speak. You have no right to pretend that you understand the currents, the emotions and the eventual decisions in the region. You are all simply gathering more clicks and more triggered audiences. I personally am sick of the American (specifically) pundits that love to condemn the Arabs and here is the dark underbelly. If one can use your allotted time to condemn Assad, and condemn the Arabs, by definition, ergo … you might just make the empire look a little better. Hey Ho! somebody is worse than my empire! You always say it is the empire, but this time it is the Arabs, it is al-Assad, it is Putin. And underneath that is a empirical mindset that is very hard to change, despite the sweet talk in times of winning. They want to WIN! May I ask you, who else wants to WIN in the empire lineup. That is the side that these ones choose while pretending that their condemnation is moral. We are in a different world now. We need to act and respond differently.
I’ve said for weeks now, we have to reform as a resistance.
This is exactly why I refused to condemn Assad. In the first place, I saw it was a lost cause to start the 3rdWW over Syria. Secondly, while Assad surely made mistakes, and while those Arabic ‘sandniggers’ may have stood back from a war, we have to understand that the empire wants to pit them against us, with Netanyahu as the airforce of ISIS in a strategy of chaos. Let us not again fall for that old canard. The region, despite the selfserving objectives of many, dodged a bullet. Syria was sacrificed, yet it is not over. The horrors that will increase in Syria, must be overshadowed with the horrors in Gaza and the West Bank. It is not different, it is how empire does things. Syria will remain in chaos and anarchy. The looming win here, is the hatred that zion engendered for itself across the world. It is a win that is difficult to see currently.
This is a temporary loss and I dare say in a year or two, our world will be different. We need to build up the resistance step by step. It does feel we are starting anew.
Back to the real war
From Russia, we have the summary of General Valery Gerasimov and can see exactly what Russia is intending to do. https://sovereignista.com/2024/12/18/chief-of-the-general-staff-of-the-armed-forces-of-the-russian-federation-first-deputy-russian-defence-minister-general-of-the-army-valery-gerasimov/. Bear in mind chaos cannot be won by chaos. Someone must remain pragmatic. Mr Putin said that his only regret in terms of the SMO is that Russia should have started earlier. What I read by that, is that Russia should literally have walked into the chaos period of the fall of empire and they should not have waited.
China considers itself the fount of pragmatism. The word appearing from there, is that China is keeping the economy of the world alive and afloat, as well as so far, refusing to take part in war, while building weapons and defensive technologies as this war of chaos spreads in their sphere of influence. They know that their part on the economic front, is indispensable. What a spectacular win from the depths of Latin America on the Chancay port, where the first cargo from Latin America was delivered in Shangai. Did you ever think blueberries can win? Empire fought tooth and nail, but this line is open now. What a spectacular loss for the empirical ‘back-yard’
In reality this War on BRICS is a desperate attempt by the empire to retain their octopus control. It is a desperate attempt to maintain and retain their dominance. So, that is the one side.
As we saw from Syria, there are battles that empire can win, and win handily. They do not deal with fairness. They deal with rules based, their rules. If they have to send in the clowns or the headchoppers, they do that. They do not mind and do not care who they kill, maim, plunder or genocide. EMPIRE IS FIGHTING ON THE BACK FOOT. IT IS REARGUARD ACTION. Nevertheless, their teeth are still in good working order and they are not doddering and falling yet. Yes, they do need a kick in the teeth but that could come in different ways, and hopefully without killing off the rest of the world.
They are eating their young at this stage. The state of European leadership must tell you that this is true. France is a joke. Germany is a bigger joke. Canada is falling out of a tree and Britian? Oh dear. So, what else is left? They are tossing one another into the pit of hell where they should be.
As we see the shape of the new war materialize, we also see the fall of empire materialize. Mr Trump was blown in there to give the citizenry a new hope, a new focus. If you think that Mr.Trump is going to destroy ‘the deep state’ please disabuse yourself of that notion. The only thing that you need to look at, is his cotery of billionaires. It is a faction fight in empire. Pay little attention to that, and pay more attention to building resistance.
What does the resistance have?
What are the tools and the strategies that we have? We are fighting with one arm tied behind our backs. We have honor, we don’t want to kill civilians, we do not run genocides and we know that war is about the worst thing that can happen. We do not have the reach of the empirical media, we are not skilled at the lies, the propaganda and the sheer number of people trained in schools and in universities and in think-tanks that can be brought to the side of the empire to create a unicorn false reality. I was trained in one of those schools and, when I wiped the sleep out of my eyes after excellent training because it was excellent, I slowly, oh so slowly, disappeared into the woodwork as I saw this was a war unto the death, and I was given the skills as an empire soldier.
What we have is a starter new economic structure. BRICS countries are now able to pay one another without touching empirical structures. Yes, it has been a long time but this is a war strategy. Those do not get designed overnight. Economically BRICS is streaks ahead of the G7. The more we trade with one another, the more we take the foundations away from empire. I am disappointed that we do not have a BRICS currency yet. The Europeans made a Euro, so it is possible.
We have a philosophy. We have a blueprint. We have incredibly smart people. We have leaders that we revere and they do not make fools out of themselves. BRICS needs a lot of development but the basic work is done. There are still basics outstanding as we all would like to see a more formal BRICS structure. At the moment, the structure works in a sense, as they cannot be attacked in a ephemeral state.
We now can define the enemy and its strategy of chaos. The enemy of the Iranian nation is that same enemy of the Palestinian nation. It is the same enemy of the Lebanese nation. That same government is the enemy of the Iraqi nation. It is the enemy of the Egyptian nation. It is the enemy of the Syrian nation. It is the enemy of the Yemeni nation. It is the enemy of Russia, of China of the Latin Americas. It is in the final analysis the enemy of you, as it will not hesitate to wipe you off the map.
This essay started off as a formal fully sourced treatment of what the new war looks like. With the chaos strategy it takes too long to peer through the mists of that and we will have to get used to quick assessments. The old essay will appear but it changes day by day and I run to keep up with my own essay. It needs an edit and update daily. Chaos waits for no man or woman.
Good enough for now to understand what the new war looks like on a high level and on a high level start outlining the main tools and strategies of resistance. I use resistance here not as the well-know ‘axis of resistance’ but for what it means to each of us, for our own personal resistance against empire.
Finally I want to congratulate all of the commentators and the commentary during the loss of Syria. No matter what was said, it did not buy into a further underhanded support of empirical evil under the guise of passion, no matter which side of the equation people chose as the hill that they could stand on. Let it keep tearing loose out of your hearts. Because what we also have as a resistance is sheer heart! This one tore loose out of my heart this morning, and my formal and correct work was put aside. We know what is at stake.
Starting to see lots more reports now of the resistance coming back on the attack. Justin Podur is back on YT with a sitrep and an interview with Marandi. Jon Elmer at Electronic Intifada, posted elsewhere here, has his reports of Palestinian actions. And Rania Khalek has an interesting backgrounder… Read more »
I still don’t know who betrayed Syria. We know that someone(s) in the high command ordered the soldiers to withdraw, and it seems to have been a surprise to Assad (and seemingly the Russians too). The “Arabs” were already fighting and prepared to fight to the last to defend their… Read more »
“We have lost one battle and this resistance is making themselves fall apart by senseless and useless internal strife, shouting over one another in one fiery youtube after the other. All because they cannot see that we’ve simply lost a battle.” well said. No need to drown in despair. Alternating… Read more »
Laith made a very true comment. He said Western analysts are unable to effect any change in their own countries, so they are frustrated at their own impotence. It’s been years for people like Paul Craig Roberts, as a very good example, who continually wine because of what Putin does,… Read more »
Laith believes Russia was part of a deal. I agree.. He highlighted the convenient jamming of all Russkie/Soviet comms during the lightening blitz; Assad’s first secret visit to Moscow as the invasion began; the melting of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) on command top down. But I disagree it was a… Read more »
yes Amarynth, such journalists get unsubscribe from me. As this process unfolds we see at what point a journalists true colours are forced out into the open. PCR for example was a whiner right out of the box from years ago, others are just now coming out of the closet.… Read more »