The Unit – de-dollarization bombshell
De-Dollarization Bombshell: The Coming of BRICS+ Decentralized Monetary Ecosystem
This is by Pepe Escobar and first posted at Sputnik Globe. Before we dive in to Pepe’s reporting, all of our econmically minded and all others should understand this work. This is the set-up of that magic number that we all have been waiting for – the number that will most probably be used almost in place of the dead US dollar, TO ALLOW ALL TO TRADE FAIRLY. We’ve been salivating while waiting and now I have not read Pepe’s work – excitement rolled me over.
The Unit indeed!. Over to Pepe …
Get ready for what may well be the geoeconomic bombshell of 2024: the coming of a decentralized monetary ecosystem.
Welcome to The Unit – a concept that has already been discussed by the financial services and investments working group set up by the BRICS+ Business Council and has a serious shot at becoming official BRICS+ policy as early as in 2025.
According to Alexey Subbotin, founder of Arkhangelsk Capital Management and one of the Unit’s conceptualizers, this is a new problem-solving system that addresses the key geoeconomic issue of these troubled times: a global crisis of trust.
He knows all about it first-hand: a seasoned financial professional with experience in investment banking, asset management and corporate matters, Subbotin leads the Unit project under the auspices of IRIAS, an international intergovernmental organization set up in 1976 in accordance with the UN statute.
The Global Majority has had enough of the centrally controlled monetary framework put in place 80 years ago in Bretton Woods and its endemic flaws: chronic deficits fueling irresponsible military spending; speculative bubbles; politically motivated sanctions and secondary sanctions; abuse of settlement and payment infrastructure; protectionism; and the lack of fair arbitration.
In contrast, the Unit proposes a reliable, quick and economically efficient solution for cross-border payments. The – transactional – Unit is a game-changer as a new form of international currency that can be issued in a de-centralized way, and then recognized and regulated at national level.
The Unit offers a unique solution for bottlenecks in global financial infrastructure: it is eligible for traditional banking operations as well as for the newest forms of digital banking.
The Unit can also help to upend unfair pricing in commodity trading, by means of setting up a new – fair and efficient – Eurasian Mercantile Exchange where trading and settlement can be done in a new currency bridging trade flows and capital, thus paving the way to the development of new financial products for foreign direct investment (FDI).
The strength of the Unit, conceptually, is to remove direct dependency on the currency of other nations, and to offer especially to the Global Majority a new form of apolitical money – with huge potential for anchoring fair trade and investments.
It is indeed a new concept in terms of an international currency – anchored in gold (40%) and BRICS+ currencies (60%). It is neither crypto nor stablecoin – as it’s shown here.
The Beauty of Going Fractal
The Global Majority will instantly grasp the primary purpose of the Unit: to harmonize trade and financial flows by keeping them outside of political pressure or “rules” that can be twisted at will. The inevitable consequence translates as financial sovereignty. What matters in the whole process are independent monetary policies focused on economic growth.
That’s the key appeal for the Global Majority: a full ecosystem offering independent, complementary monetary infrastructure. And that surely can be extended to willing Unit partners in the collective West.
Now to the practical level: as Subbotin explains, the Unit ecosystem may be easily scalable because it comes from a fractal architecture supported by simple rules. New Unit nodes can be set up by either sovereign or private agents, following a detailed rule-book in custody of the UN-chartered IRIAS.
The Unit organizers employ a distributed ledger: a technology that ensures transparency, precluding capital controls or any exchange rate manipulation.
This means that connection is available to all open DEX and digital platforms operated by both commercial and Central Banks around the world.
The endgame is that everyone, essentially, may use the Unit for accounting, bookkeeping, pricing, settling, paying, saving and investing.
No wonder the institutional possibilities are quite enticing – as the Unit can be used for accounting and settlement for BRICS+; payment and pricing for the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU); or as a reserve currency for Sub-Saharan Africa.
Analysis
US Confiscation of Russian Assets Will ‘Supercharge’ De-Dollarization
21 April, 02:02 GMT
And now comes the clincher: the Unit has already received backing by the BRICS Business Council and is on the agenda at the crucial ministerial meeting in Russia next month, which will work out the road map for the summit next October in Kazan.
That means the Unit has all it takes to be on the table as a serious subject discussed by BRICS+ and eventually be adopted as early as in 2025.
Will Musk and the NDB Be on Board?
As it stands, the priority for the Unit conceptualizers – whom I followed for over a year during several, detailed meetings in Moscow – is to inform the general public about the new system.
The Unit team is not interested at all in getting straight into political hot waters or to be cornered by ideologically-laden arguments. Direct references to inspiring but sometimes controversial concepts or authors like Zoltan Pozsar may bury the Unit concept into pigeon holes, thus limiting its potential impact.
What may lie ahead could be extraordinarily exciting, as the Unit appeal could extend all the way from Elon Musk to the BRICS’s New Development Bank (NDB), hopefully engaging an array of crucial actors. After a positive evaluation by Finance Minister Anton Siluanov – who remains on the post in the new Russian government – it’s not far-fetched to imagine Putin and Xi discussing it face to face this week in Beijing.
As it stands, the major takeaway is that the Unit should be seen as a feasible, technical solution for the theoretically Unsolvable: a globally-recognized payment/trade system, immune to political pressure. It’s the only game in town – there are no others.
Meanwhile, the Unit conceptualizers are open for constructive criticism and all manners of collaboration. Yet sooner or later the battle ranks will be lined up – and then it will be a matter of seriously upping the game.
“Academically Sound, Technologically Innovative”
Vasily Zhabykin, co-author of the Unit white paper and founder of CFA.Center, Unit’s technological partner at Skolkovo Innovation Hub in Moscow, crucially stresses: the Unit “represents apolitical money and can be the connector between the Global South and the West.”
He’s keen to point out that “the Unit can keep all the wheels turning unlike most of the other concepts that feature ‘dollar killers’, etc. We do not want to harm anybody. Our goal is to improve efficiency of currently broken capital and money flows. The Unit is rather the ‘cure for centralized cancer’’’.
Subbotin and the Unit team “are keen to meet new partners who share our approach and are ready to bring additional value to our project.” If that’s the case, they should “send us 3 bullet points on how can they help and improve the Unit.”
A bold follow-up step should be, for instance, a virtual conference on the Unit, featuring leading Russian economist Sergey Glazyev, Yannis Varoufakis, Jeffrey Sachs and Michael Hudson, among others.
By email, Glazyev, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Minister of Integration and Macroeconomics of the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU) , summed up the Unit’s potential:
“I have been following the development of Unit for more than a year and can confirm that Unit offers a very timely, feasible solution. It is academically sound, technologically innovative and at the same time complementary to the existing banking infrastructure.
Launching it under the auspices of an UN institution gives Unit legitimacy, which the current Bretton Woods framework is clearly lacking. Recent actions by the US administration and loud silence from IMF clearly indicate the need for change.
A decentralized approach to emission of potential global trade currency, whose intrinsic value is anchored in physical gold and BRICS+ currencies, makes Unit the most promising of several approaches being considered. It balances political priorities of all participants, while helping each sovereign economy develop along its optimal path.
The New Development Bank (NDB) and BRICS+ shall embrace the concept of Unit and help it to become the pinnacle of the new emerging global financial infrastructure, free from malign political interferences while focused instead on fair trade and sustainable economic growth.”
A clear, practical example of possible Unit problem-solving concerns Russia-Iran trade relations. These are two top BRICS members. Russian trade with Iran is unprofitable due to sanctions – and both cannot make payments in US dollars or euros.
Russian companies suffer significant losses after switching to payments in national currencies. With each transfer, Russian businesses on average lose as much as 25% due to the discrepancy between the market rate in Iran and the state rate.
And here’s the key takeaway: BRICS+ as well as the Global Majority can only be strengthened by developing closer geoeconomics ties. The removal of Western speculative capital shall free up local commodity trading, and enable the pooling of investable capital for sustainable development. To unlock such a vast potential, the Unit may well be the key.
What happened to my comment ?
Which comment? This one? Or another one? We have no spam or trash comments today or yesterday, so, I don’t really know what you are asking? “This project coming to fruition after years of work on same can very well be the answer to the many problems created by the… Read more »
Yes I posted and the comment appeared as posted but disappeared as I re-read it ,but I see it is up again .I just joined and did not know about moderators etc. Thank you as my post had nothing derogatory in it.Thank you for this site as I always want… Read more »
Hi Guy, just for your information, we try and behave ourselves without moderators. It may work on the long run and it may not, but at this moment we are trying to be adult. I mean, who wants babysitters? Major rule here, don’t fight with others – be respectful, but… Read more »
This project coming to fruition after years of work on same can very well be the answer to the many problems created by the Rothschild family with Western nation’s blessings at the beginning of the 20th century .i.e. Boom and Bust cycles .If politics can be eliminated or at the… Read more »
So I read the UNIT white paper and my initial thoughts are that this is clearly designed for trade settlement not FX reserves (not quasi-SDR like IMF). The key difficulties govts will have with the UNIT is the audits and the requirement to back every new issue (even though fractal).… Read more »
This is how I think of it indeed .. a number to trade by. But one can also use it as a so-called savings? Ehhh, yeah, I want the white paper lol.
Pepe gives kind words on his telegram channel:
https://sovereignista.com/2024/05/13/the-unit-de-dollarization-bombshell/
“Excellent discussion on my de-dollarization bombshell column and The Unit. To be continued.’
KINESIS THE MANY ROADS TO DEDOLLARISATION AND SOUND MONEY To me this is another splendid accompaniment to all of the BRICS+ initiatives – it has the potential to be an absolute game changer, as it creates a yield when you store your gold and silver, NOT A BILL FOR STORAGE!… Read more »
I thought The Unit was the operations part of the CIA, turns out, it is the up and coming solution.
So Russian businesses are paying a tax and providing Iran with foreign aid directly — no strings attached such as purchasing a missile defense system developed in 1969 IIRC and was as obsolete as versions of SCUDS that were obsolete themselves in the 1980s?
“The dollar is not money, it is the backside of a bond coupon.” – Jim Willie OK, I don’t agree with everything JW says, but on BRICS+ I pretty much agree with all of his thoughts. His comments on the timing are particularly pertinent and this should be an answer… Read more »
It (FRNs) is a note payable in a carpet of bombs, at any time in any location, and in any quantity.
A THEORETICAL EXPLORATION – TEXAS APPLYING FOR BRICS+ MEMBERSHIP This idea was first raised by Yaroslav Lissovolik in an article written for the Valdai Club back in 2017. The idea was to expand membership to sub-national regions (SNRS). Obviously any prospect of this happening in the short term is highly… Read more »
Not if they want a war with Mexico at the same time, unless they win by losing and actually know it.
Yeah Wlhaught – I’m turning 70 this year, and I have not been alive for one day where they haven’t been at war in at least one place on this planet.
Cheers
Col
Theoretically Col, it looks kinda perfect, and ‘welcome to Texas’ in a manner of speaking (remember readers, theoreticall!) but I still want to see real commodities. 5% or so, no?
Yes, me too Amarynth. I suppose we won’t know for sure thefull story until after the 2023 October Kazan meeting. All of the countries involved at the South African Summit were asked to put all of their experts to work and to present their findings at the 2024 Kazan meeting.… Read more »
Fair enough..so then it’s more of a proposed framework. In particular “..It is neither crypto nor stablecoin”. I confess that concept seems eerily similar to both in terms of attributes (distributed nodes, blockchain ledger, underlying assets whether physical material, labor-hours, energy). At least going by the 1st of many readings.… Read more »
What you say and what you ask for is valid. Why I pay attention to this, and close attention, is that I’ve read and listened to everythig BRICS related .. in detail and I know we were waiting for this .. and I knew the shape that it had to… Read more »
Unless and until the commodity exchanges are liberated from the clutches of the west, it would be a serious leverage in the west’s hands to manipulate the Unit. Commodities could be included later once commodity exchanges are moved from London and Chicago to Russia and China.
That process is well on the way already, Sam. In the Andrew Maguire interview I posted in this string they discuss this at around 59:00.
Regards
Col
Hi everyone, I wanted to read “The Unit” paper in detail for myself. The results on ‘that Yother not–google et al‘ search engine are sparse. Having trouble of what to make of the results. 1. https://unitfoundation.org/ 2. https://vblgoldfix.substack.com/p/what-is-the-unit 3. https://cfa.center/#main #2 seems to be as close as I can get… Read more »
There are working papers I would imagine, but nothing like a white paper yet. Pepe and other journos have been sitting in any of the public meetings and attending discussions and sitting at the bar .. that is why he says .. …. the Unit has already received backing by… Read more »
Hi everyone, I want to read “The Unit” paper in detail for myself. The results on ‘that Yother not–google et al‘ search engine are sparse. Having trouble of what to make of the results. 1. https://unitfoundation.org/ 2. https://vblgoldfix.substack.com/p/what-is-the-unit 3. https://cfa.center/#main #2 seems to be as close as I can get… Read more »
Looking at Colin’s work, this is oh so relevant
And now China wants to share development dividents…
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202405/1312183.shtml
My adoptive country, Thailand, has been paying the UAE in e-Baht for oil since early 2022. The central bank here uses China’s mBridge exchange platform to trade with a dozen other countries around the world. The platform will be openly available later this year.
Details: https://herecomeschina.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/136157049/share-center
There are a number of such deals going on. Russia and Iran has their own equivalent system. The Eurasian Economic Union countries have a few among rhem. But this is not only a system, but a complete framework of a viable financial system that can kick out Bretton Woods and… Read more »
Great to see you keeping an eye on us here at GS, Godfree.
Cheers
Col
Wow – quite the bombshell – I am going to need a day or two to soak all of this in – especially the “anchored in gold (40%) and BRICS currencies (60%)” part of the equation. It is being presented as not being the “dollar killer”, but it seems to… Read more »
I just referred back to my thesis on ‘Operation Sandman’ (a massive coordinated sell-off of US Govt Debt) in… https://sovereignista.com/2024/02/29/banking-2-0/ What I am hearing about ‘The Unit’ fits with my points 1-6. In other words, the road is going to be rocky enough for humanity as it is, without deliberately… Read more »
Public Banking Institute – Banking in the Public Interest
What is needed is for Pindostan to not have a second-term President come 20 January 2025. I suppose word salad Harris will do, but it is either that or it must cease to exist one way or another before then. Perhaps a breakup into 55 or even 3148 pieces.
I am assuming nine small islands, atolls, and reefs do not count.
The proxy war of Banderastan vs Russia is a giant kleptocratic heist, so I guess that is not really happening either.
Very true on the climate CO2 scam .It is falling apart as the real scientists have exposed the frauds like Gore and Kerry .
“Launching it under the auspices of an UN institution gives Unit legitimacy, which the current Bretton Woods framework is clearly lacking. Recent actions by the US administration and loud silence from IMF clearly indicate the need for change.” This is an additional clue why the UN is adhered to by… Read more »
This is why Lavrov consistently held that we need the UN – but we also need it reformed.
We also have Glazyev in a manner of speaking but not Pozsar. Good!
I must study this a little more on the technical side. Where are you Col,
Where am I you ask, Amarynth –
Well, “I came out of my cave walking upside down” and saw the news – methinks that as this event unfolds, it will become bigger than 1913, Bretton Woods, and 1971 combined.
Bring it on
Col